Μετάφραση και ανάλυση λέξεων από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ChatGPT
Σε αυτήν τη σελίδα μπορείτε να λάβετε μια λεπτομερή ανάλυση μιας λέξης ή μιας φράσης, η οποία δημιουργήθηκε χρησιμοποιώντας το ChatGPT, την καλύτερη τεχνολογία τεχνητής νοημοσύνης μέχρι σήμερα:
- πώς χρησιμοποιείται η λέξη
- συχνότητα χρήσης
- χρησιμοποιείται πιο συχνά στον προφορικό ή γραπτό λόγο
- επιλογές μετάφρασης λέξεων
- παραδείγματα χρήσης (πολλές φράσεις με μετάφραση)
- ετυμολογία
interpretation of the law - translation to ιταλικό
![Interpreting booths in the [[European Parliament]] where interpreters simultaneously interpret debates between the 24 official [[languages of the European Union]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/2007 07 16 parlament europejski bruksela 45.JPG?width=200 "Interpreting booths in the [[European Parliament]] where interpreters simultaneously interpret debates between the 24 official [[languages of the European Union]]")
![Nuremberg defendants]] at dock listening to simultaneous interpretation](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Defendants in the dock at nuremberg trials.jpg?width=200 "Nuremberg defendants]] at dock listening to simultaneous interpretation")
![operation]] to his [[servant]], who acts as an interpreter](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dr. Thomas Colledge with Patients.jpg?width=200 "operation]] to his [[servant]], who acts as an interpreter")
.jpg?width=200 "Interpreting booths at a conference by the World Trade Organization 2017")
![Interpreter (left) next to Swedish filmmaker [[Johannes Nyholm]] at [[Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema]] 2019](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Johannes Nyholm presenting Koko-di Koko-da at BAFICI 2019.jpg?width=200 "Interpreter (left) next to Swedish filmmaker [[Johannes Nyholm]] at [[Buenos Aires International Festival of Independent Cinema]] 2019")
![Simultaneous interpreter's station (Televic Conference) at the [[European Court of Justice]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Simultandolmetscheranlage.jpg?width=200 "Simultaneous interpreter's station (Televic Conference) at the [[European Court of Justice]]")
![[[Stéphane Brizé]] (second from the right) speaking in French in [[Buenos Aires]] in 2019. Seated to his left, the interpreter (on the extreme right) waits to translate into Spanish.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Stéphane Brizé in Buenos Aires in 2019.jpg?width=200 "[[Stéphane Brizé]] (second from the right) speaking in French in [[Buenos Aires]] in 2019. Seated to his left, the interpreter (on the extreme right) waits to translate into Spanish.")
![A US military interpreter sits with Afghan army soldiers, [[Ghazni province]].](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/U.S. Army Sgt. Bardia Afsari, left, a translator assigned to the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, talks with Staff Sgt. John Evans, right, assigned to 340th Military Information Support Team 120528-A-NI188-030.jpg?width=200 "A US military interpreter sits with Afghan army soldiers, [[Ghazni province]].")
Ορισμός
Βικιπαίδεια
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is law that is based on precedents, that is the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals. These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are established by executive agencies based on statutes. In some jurisdictions, case law can be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
In common law countries (including the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand), it is used for judicial decisions of selected appellate courts, courts of first instance, agency tribunals, and other bodies discharging adjudicatory functions.
